东京热无码

Skip to main content

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

July 29, 2016
For More Information Contact:

JP O'Hare

(518) 474-1201

Press@nysed.gov

东京热无码 Seal

东京热无码 Department Releases Spring 2016 Grades 3-8 ELA and Math Assessment Results

东京热无码 Department Releases

Spring 2016 Grades 3-8 ELA and Math Assessment Results

Students Demonstrate Proficiency Increases

State Will Continue to Engage Parents & Teachers to Further Multi-Year Process to Improve Assessments

Summary of Results Can Be Viewed

Video and Audio of Commissioner Elia Available for Download

Audio:

Video:

The 东京热无码 Department today released the results of the 2016 Grades 3-8 English language arts (ELA) and math tests. In ELA this year, the percentage of听 students in grades 3-8 who scored at the proficient level (Levels 3 and 4) increased by 6.6 percentage points to 37.9, up from 31.3 in 2015. In math, the percentage of students who scored at the proficient level increased this year to 39.1, up one percentage point from 38.1 in 2015.

% of Students Proficient in Grades 3-8

2015

2016

Percentage Point Change

Statewide Combined Grades ELA

31.3

37.9

6.6

Statewide Combined Grades Math

38.1

39.1

1

鈥淭he Regents, Commissioner and I have worked hard to make New York鈥檚 assessments the best they can be for our students,鈥 Board of Regents Chancellor Betty A. Rosa said. 鈥淚鈥檝e always said that tests must be diagnostic, valid and reliable while providing timely and practical information to parents and teachers. We made important changes to the assessments this year and we鈥檙e going to continue to look at ways to make them even better moving forward. While it鈥檚 not possible to make direct comparisons of this year鈥檚 results to past years, I鈥檓 cautiously optimistic the changes we鈥檙e making will drive improvements in teaching and learning.鈥

鈥淭he Regents and I are committed to continuously improving our standards, our curriculum and our assessments,鈥 东京热无码 Commissioner MaryEllen Elia said. 鈥淪ince my first day on the job a little over a year ago, I鈥檝e been listening to parents, teachers, school administrators and the public 鈥 seeking their expertise on how we can improve. We鈥檝e taken their advice and made important changes to the exams. It鈥檚 an ongoing process, but better standards, better curriculum and better tests will result in better student outcomes.鈥听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听

2016 Results

SED made several changes to the 2016 ELA and math exams through a deliberate process. These changes included: starting with a new test vendor with a contract that required greater teacher involvement; reducing the number of questions on every grade 3-8 ELA and math assessments; and allowing students who are productively working to complete their exams.

In addition, SED released more test questions than ever before and earlier than ever before to support instruction. Further, when parents receive their child鈥檚 school reports later this summer, they will see that they are easier to understand and provide more information on how their child performed.

This year鈥檚 changes to the tests are part of a multi-year process that started with the Board of Regents鈥 in June 2015 and then solicited feedback from parents, teachers, administrators and students. The process included making as part of Governor鈥檚 Task Force and presenting the final changes to the Board of Regents in December 2015. SED implemented the changes in time for the spring 2016 exams.

While the content of the 2016 tests and last year鈥檚 tests are comparable and similarly rigorous, it is not possible to make direct comparisons of the 2016 results to prior years鈥 results because of changes to the tests this year. The 2016 results are valid and reliable indicators of student proficiency in the tested grades and subjects.

Big 5 City School Districts

In ELA this year, the percentage of all test takers in grades 3-8 who scored at the proficient level increased over last year in each of the Big 5 City School Districts. New York City鈥檚 proficiency increased by 7.6 percentage points to 38 percent. For the first time, New York City now meets the rest of the state in proficiency in English Language Arts

In the other Big 5 cities, student proficiency increased over last year as follows: Buffalo increased by 4.5 percentage points; Rochester increased by 2 percentage points; Syracuse increased by 2.8 percentage points; and Yonkers increased by 5.7 percentage points.

% of Students Proficient 听in ELA Across All Grades, 3-8

2015

2016

Percentage Point Change

NYC

30.4

38

7.6

Buffalo

11.9

16.4

4.5

Rochester

4.7

6.7

2

Syracuse

8.1

10.9

2.8

Yonkers

20.3

26

5.7

In math, the percentage of students in grades 3-8 who scored at the proficient level increased slightly over last year in most of the Big 5 City School Districts. New York City鈥檚 proficiency increased by 1.2 percentage points; Buffalo increased by 1 percentage point; Rochester鈥檚 proficiency declined by 0.2 percentage points; Syracuse increased by 1 percentage point; and Yonkers increased by 0.6 percentage points.

% of Students Proficient in Math Across All Grades 3-8

2015

2016

Percentage Point Change

NYC

35.2

36.4

1.2

Buffalo

15.1

16.1

1

Rochester

7.4

7.2

-0.2

Syracuse

9.4

10.4

1

Yonkers

24

24.6

0.6

Black and Hispanic Students

In 2016, ELA proficiency across all grades for black and Hispanic students increased over last year, with increases seen both statewide and in New York City. Statewide, black students saw a 7.7-percentage-point increase in those achieving proficiency while Hispanic students experienced a 7.1-percentage-point increase. In both cases, the increases were greater than those seen by white students, who experienced a 5.6-percentage-point increase statewide. As a result, the achievement gap in ELA that separates the proficiency of black and Hispanic students from their white peers closed slightly statewide.

In New York City, black students scoring at the ELA proficiency level increased 7.6 percentage points; Hispanic students increased 7.4 percentage points; and white students increased 7.6 percentage points.

Statewide % of Students Proficient听 in Grades 3-8 ELA

2015

2016

Percentage Point Change

Asian/Pacific Islander ELA

52.5

59

6.5

Black ELA

18.5

26.2

7.7

Hispanic ELA

19.7

26.8

7.1

American Indian/ Alaska Native ELA

23.8

29.9

6.1

White ELA

40.4

46

5.6

NYC % of Students Proficient听 in Grades 3-8 ELA

2015

2016

Percentage Point Change

NYC Asian/Pacific Islander ELA

52

58.8

6.8

NYC Black ELA

19

26.6

7.6

NYC Hispanic ELA

19.8

27.2

7.4

NYC American Indian/ Alaska Native ELA

28.7

34.9

6.2

NYC White ELA

51.3

58.9

7.6

Proficiency on the math exam statewide and in New York City also increased for black and Hispanic students in math this year, however, less than in ELA.

Statewide % of Students Proficient听 in Grades 3-8 Math

2015

2016

Percentage Point Change

Asian/Pacific Islander Math

66

66.5

0.5

Black Math

21.3

23

1.7

Hispanic Math

24.5

25.7

1.2

American Indian/ Alaska Native Math

30.7

29.5

-1.2

White Math

49.7

50

0.3

NYC % of Students Proficient听 in Grades 3-8 Math

2015

2016

Percentage Point Change

NYC Asian/Pacific Islander Math

66.8

67.2

0.4

NYC Black Math

19.1

20

0.9

NYC Hispanic Math

23.7

24.3

0.6

NYC American Indian/ Alaska Native Math

34.3

32.2

-2.1

NYC White Math

56.7

57.8

1.1

English Language Learners

Statewide in ELA, proficiency increased for both 鈥淓ver ELLs鈥 (students who received ELL services prior to but not during the 2015-16 school year) and 鈥淣ever ELLs鈥 (students who never received ELL services). Ever ELL students performing at the proficiency level increased by 9 percentage points this year while Ever ELLs outperformed all grade 3-8 test takers combined, statewide.

In math, Ever ELL students scoring at the proficiency level increased by three percentage points while Never ELL students experienced 1.0-percentage-point increase in proficiency.

% of Students Proficient in听 Grades 3-8

2015

2016

Percentage Point Change

Current ELLs ELA

3.9

4

0.1

Ever ELLs ELA

30.5

39.7

9.2

Never ELLs ELA

33.9

40.8

6.9

Current ELLs Math

12.7

11.5

-1.2

Ever ELLs Math

40.6

43.6

3

Never ELLs Math

40.7

41.7

1.0

Students with Disabilities

Across the state, the percentage of students with disabilities who scored at the proficient level increased in both ELA and math. While a greater percentage of students with disabilities reached proficiency in 2016, their proficiency on the state assessments continues to be lower than the proficiency of general education students.听

% of Students Proficient in听 Grades 3-8

2015

2016

Percentage Point Change

Student with Disabilities ELA

5.7

7.9

2.2

Student with Disabilities Math

10.6

10.9

0.3

Charter Schools

The percentage of charter school students who scored at the proficient level on the ELA exam across grades 3-8 increased this year, more so for students attending charter schools in New York City. Statewide, the proficiency of students in charter schools increased by 12.8 percentage points on the ELA exam while in New York City, proficiency increased by 13.7 percentage points.

In math, student proficiency increased less. Statewide, students in charter schools scoring at the proficient level increased by 3.9 percentage points on the math exam; in New York City, proficiency increased by 4.5 percentage points.

% of Students Proficient in听 Grades 3-8

2015

2016

Percentage Point Change

Charter Schools Combined Grades ELA

27.5

40.3

12.8

NYC Charter Combined Grades ELA

29.3

43

13.7

Charter Schools Combined Grades Math

41.5

45.4

3.9

NYC Charter Combined Grades Math

44.2

48.7

4.5

Early Grade ELA Improvement

Student proficiency on the ELA exam went up the most in grades 3 and 4 this year. Statewide, the percentage of third graders who scored at the proficient level increased by 10.9 percentage points over last year while fourth graders experienced an 8.1-percentage-point increase.

% of Students Proficient听 in ELA in Grades 3-8

2015

2016

Percentage Point Change

Statewide Combined Grade 3 ELA

31

41.9

10.9

Statewide Combined Grade 4 ELA

32.7

40.8

8.1

While one reason for the increases cannot be pinpointed, a variety of factors may have contributed. In response to feedback received from stakeholders across the state, the Department made a number of changes to the Grades 3-8 assessments this year including reducing the number of test questions on every assessment and allowing students who were working productively to complete their exams without time constraints. Further, teachers have had an additional year of experience with, and professional development in, the State鈥檚 higher learning standards. That added comfort and experience may have resulted in greater levels of student proficiency.

Not Tested Count and Test Refusal Count

Historically, SED only tracked the number of students not tested for an invalid, unknown reason. These students are categorized as 鈥渘ot tested鈥 students.听 The not tested count includes students who were absent during the test administration period as well as students who refused the test. The count does not include students who were medically excused.

According to state data, approximately 78 percent of eligible students participated in the 2016 Grades 3-8 ELA and math tests, which is relatively flat compared to the previous year鈥檚 80 percent. About 22 percent of eligible test takers did not participate in these tests and did not have a recognized, valid reason for not participating (not tested), again remaining relatively flat with 20 percent in 2015.

This year SED, in collaboration with the Regional Information Centers, improved its data collection methods and can now provide Test Refusal data.听 This year, the test refusal rate was approximately 21 percent, which is relatively flat with last year. A Test Refusal file by school district will be available online later today at:听 .

% of Students Statewide Not Tested & Test Refusal

2015 Not Tested

2016 Not Tested

2016 Test Refusal

20%

22%

21%

Department data shows about 50 percent of the test refusal students this year did not participate in 2015.

In addition, the 2016 test refusal students were much more likely to be from low-need or average-need districts; more likely to have scored at Level 1 and Level 2 in 2015 if they took the tests; less likely to be economically disadvantaged; less likely to be a student with a disability; and much less likely to be English Language Learners.

Like last year, this year鈥檚 proficiency rates represent the 900,000 students who actually took the test. There is no statewide measure of knowledge and skill for those students who refused the test.

School and District Results

A summary of the test results, as well as individual school and district results, will be available later today at: .

Video and Audio Available

Video and Audio of Commissioner Elia are available for download.

Audio:

Video:

-30-